The privatization is not a panacea

We often hear from government officials that there are too many state-run enterprises in Ukraine and that their privatization will give a powerful impetus to investment influx and economic growth. Is it so?

One should look at the contribution of state-run enterprises to the Ukrainian economy, not at their number, which currently exceeds 3,000. Moreover, this contribution should be assessed not only as a whole, but also by sectors.

According to the Ministry of Economy, the share of state-run enterprises in the Ukrainian economy amount to just 13%. In the meantime, state-run enterprises are concentrated in the energy (Naftogaz, Energoatom, Centrenergo etc.) and transport (primarily Ukrzaliznytsia) sectors. Their contribution to the Ukrainian economy is estimated at 40.5% and 29.3% respectively.

State-run enterprises operating in these sectors are natural monopolies. What matters in this respect is not the form of ownership, but transparent and effective activity of national regulators, the National Commission for State Regulation of Energy and Utilities (NCSREU) and the Antimonopoly Committee, that regulate the activities of natural monopolies.

With weak (‘privatized’) national regulators, it doesn’t matter whether monopolists are state or privately owned. Hence, the privatization of companies of the energy and transport sectors where natural monopolies operate will not produce any tangible effect without proper actions of the national regulators.

In other words, the effective and transparent work of the national regulators will help increase the efficiency of natural monopolies even without the privatization.

When it comes to the industrial sector, the share of state-run companies is already minimal:

  • mining industry — 6.5%;
  • processing industry — even less, 4.7%.

These privately owned sectors get no investment; the processing industry has been declining since May 2019. And this is not because of the form of ownership, but because of poor protection of property rights and a lack of proactive industrial policy of the government.

Automatic privatization of the remaining miniscule share of state-run enterprises of the mining and, especially, processing sectors will trigger neither an influx of investment nor an expansion of export markets.

Therefore, the privatization is not a panacea.

Read the original version here

This column is published with permission of the author

  • Global Market

Why sharp decrease in Ukraine’s quota won’t help European steel industry

The EU’s move to tighten the TRQ regime is driven by mounting import pressure on…

Monday June 15, 2026
  • Industry

Ukrainian steel sector has withstood war, but now it needs Europe’s fairness

I’d like to reflect on the recent study at GMK Center of challenges that European…

Thursday June 11, 2026
  • Companies

Implementation of European standards in Ukraine’s steel industry: Interpipe’s perspective

Ukraine’s accession to the European Union opens up new opportunities for domestic businesses, whilst at…

Monday June 8, 2026
  • Industry

The impact of the war in the Middle East on Ukraine’s economy in 2026: the NBU’s perspective

Volodymyr Lepushinsky, Deputy Governor of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU), discussed the scenarios and…

Thursday May 28, 2026
  • Industry

The EU is changing its rules on steel imports: what this means for Ukraine

The European Union is preparing new rules for access to the steel market, which poses…

Wednesday May 13, 2026
  • Industry

The Ukrainian steel industry and European integration: areas of conflict

The Ukrainian steel industry has found itself at the center of regulatory and trade transformations…

Tuesday May 12, 2026