The privatization is not a panacea

We often hear from government officials that there are too many state-run enterprises in Ukraine and that their privatization will give a powerful impetus to investment influx and economic growth. Is it so?

One should look at the contribution of state-run enterprises to the Ukrainian economy, not at their number, which currently exceeds 3,000. Moreover, this contribution should be assessed not only as a whole, but also by sectors.

According to the Ministry of Economy, the share of state-run enterprises in the Ukrainian economy amount to just 13%. In the meantime, state-run enterprises are concentrated in the energy (Naftogaz, Energoatom, Centrenergo etc.) and transport (primarily Ukrzaliznytsia) sectors. Their contribution to the Ukrainian economy is estimated at 40.5% and 29.3% respectively.

State-run enterprises operating in these sectors are natural monopolies. What matters in this respect is not the form of ownership, but transparent and effective activity of national regulators, the National Commission for State Regulation of Energy and Utilities (NCSREU) and the Antimonopoly Committee, that regulate the activities of natural monopolies.

With weak (‘privatized’) national regulators, it doesn’t matter whether monopolists are state or privately owned. Hence, the privatization of companies of the energy and transport sectors where natural monopolies operate will not produce any tangible effect without proper actions of the national regulators.

In other words, the effective and transparent work of the national regulators will help increase the efficiency of natural monopolies even without the privatization.

When it comes to the industrial sector, the share of state-run companies is already minimal:

  • mining industry — 6.5%;
  • processing industry — even less, 4.7%.

These privately owned sectors get no investment; the processing industry has been declining since May 2019. And this is not because of the form of ownership, but because of poor protection of property rights and a lack of proactive industrial policy of the government.

Automatic privatization of the remaining miniscule share of state-run enterprises of the mining and, especially, processing sectors will trigger neither an influx of investment nor an expansion of export markets.

Therefore, the privatization is not a panacea.

Read the original version here

This column is published with permission of the author

  • Industry

Ukrainian Railways’ tariffs indexation will increase logistics costs of the mining industry by more than UAH 10 billion per year

Starting in 2021, there was a significant increase in tariffs for the transportation of extractive…

Thursday May 8, 2025
  • Infrastructure

What determines the level of freight rates in Ukrainian seaports

The level of freight rates depends on many factors, which can be divided into market…

Wednesday May 7, 2025
  • Industry

How Ukrainian steel industry is fighting for survival and future green prospects

To read the study “Opportunities for rebuilding for iron & steel industry of Ukraine” prepared…

Monday May 5, 2025
  • Infrastructure

Marine risk insurance: what cargo owners need to know

In 2022, Ukrainian ports were under blockade. Hundreds of contracts came to a standstill –…

Wednesday April 30, 2025
  • Global Market

Is this the end of free scrap trade in the world?

The full text of GMK Center's study “Restrictions on Scrap Exports in the World 2025”…

Tuesday April 29, 2025
  • Industry

Ukrainian market of steel products for mechanical engineering to grow by 25-30% in 2024

Although the market of machine-building steel products in Ukraine is much smaller than that of…

Monday April 21, 2025