European steel importers face difficulties due to CBAM implementation – Eurometal president

The European steel import sector is facing difficulties in implementing the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) due to unexpected costs resulting from last-minute regulations. This was stated by Eurometal President Alexander Julius in an interview with Platts (S&P Global).

The European Commission published more than 1,600 pages of new calculation coefficients in December 2025, forcing most importers to try to understand the requirements that came into force on January 1, 2026.

«Most importers and their steel consumer partners will face excessive cost surprises that were never anticipated or included in the initial calculations made when contracts were signed in 2025,» explained the Eurometal president.

The inappropriate timing of the publication of the coefficients created a cascade of problems throughout the steel supply chain. Julius noted that most industry players responsible for CBAM compliance did not begin reviewing the new documentation until offices reopened on January 5.

At the same time, in early 2026, the European Commission proposed a provision for the temporary suspension of CBAM for goods in serious and unforeseen circumstances – a new Article 27a in the relevant regulation. Under pressure from EU agriculture ministers, tariffs on fertilizers may thus be reduced.

Julius expects similar political pressure from the steel sector, arguing that the justification for exemptions is disproportionate costs and price increases, which make finished steel products uncompetitive compared to those produced outside the EU and imported into the bloc.

The competitive disadvantage extends beyond imports, with EU exports also expected to decline due to rising domestic production costs.

The new rules could fundamentally change supply patterns, potentially making certain countries of origin uncompetitive and further increasing prices in conjunction with broader restrictions on EU steel imports.

The difficulties with implementing CBAM are compounded by what industry participants describe as fundamental flaws in the system, including errors and inconsistencies in default values. Alexander Julius also noted that the rushed implementation has created additional complications regarding certification requirements.

Although it is too early to observe definitive changes in supply patterns, the Eurometal president suggested that EU steel producers could benefit from rising import costs and availability.

Eurometal repeatedly asked the EC to provide a reliable basis for calculating costs well before the introduction of CBAM. However, according to Alexander Julius, these approaches «were ignored by the Commission.» The industry association claims that the EC is now punishing steel importers and their customers with «a system of inflationary cost components and unrealistic verification deadlines.»

It should be noted that, according to the EC, CBAM imports declared in the first reporting period (January 1-6, 2026) covered 1.66 million tons of goods, 98% of which were ferrous metals.

It should be recalled that in December 2025, the EU strengthened the cross-border carbon adjustment mechanism by adding a wide range of industrial goods, mostly those containing steel or aluminum. This concerns 180 new products.