On July 17, the Verkhovna Rada approved the appointment of Yulia Svyrydenko as prime minister and the updated composition of the Cabinet of Ministers. A month later, the government presented a draft action program that outlines 12 key areas of government policy for 2025-2026, as well as step-by-step implementation plans and performance indicators.
The key points of the action program that are important for the economy and business include the following:
It is very important that the government has added to the European integration action program a postponement for Ukraine of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). This will help Ukrainian exporters remain competitive in the EU market and support the national economy in wartime. Also important in the context of European integration is the intention to open negotiations on an “industrial visa-free regime,” for which the adoption of two key draft laws is planned.
On the other hand, it is already clear that the implementation of certain points of the action program will be difficult due to external circumstances beyond the government’s control. In particular, the section on European integration stipulates that the government will be ready to start negotiations with the EU on six clusters by the end of 2025. However, it is already known that Hungary will not agree to open the first cluster of negotiations on Ukraine’s accession to the EU, and it is unclear whether the European Union will implement a specific “Plan B” in this case.
Among other government intentions outlined in the action program, it is worth noting those that are extremely important for Ukrainian business and iron and steel companies in particular:
Ukrainian businesses have submitted numerous proposals to the Cabinet of Ministers’ action program. In particular, the European Business Association has proposed the following list of priority issues for the government’s immediate attention:
The Ukrainian Business Council proposes to refine the government’s action program. In particular, instead of a moratorium on inspections:
According to the business community, the creation of a State Agency for Military Risk Insurance (provided for in draft law No. 12372) is ineffective, as these functions are already performed by insurance companies. Therefore, it is proposed to provide partial state subsidies for voluntary military risk insurance by insurance companies and to provide for the use of ECA for reinsurance, instead of creating a new state body.
In addition, businesses propose introducing clear criteria for labor relations within the new Labor Code to minimize the use of sole proprietorships and simplify the working conditions for conscientious businesses. The new Tax Code should include a reduction in the number of taxes, a reduction in payroll taxes, etc.
For its part, the Ukrainian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (USIE), within the framework of the Anti-Crisis Headquarters for Economic Stability under Martial Law, proposes the following:
The following steps are among the positive decisions of the new government to stimulate business development:
At the same time, the government’s first decisions will resemble a traditional imitation of the activity. The draft program states a moratorium on business inspections for five years, while the NSDC decision of July 21 provides for a one-year restriction. In addition, on July 22, the SES launches regional inspections of fire safety and civil protection with corresponding fines for non-compliance. Moreover, regulatory authorities are finding ways to circumvent the moratorium.
«Despite the PR, the government hasn’t actually imposed the moratorium for even a day. But it is already successfully reporting on its virtual existence. Nothing has been done at all. Check out the news of the State Bureau of Investigation, the National Police or the BES… they all work in the same mode,» said MP Yaroslav Zheleznyak.
It should be noted that the government’s action plan only mentions addressing the urgent current needs of Ukrainian businesses in a fragmented and incomplete manner. In particular, the issue of reserving personnel only concerns frontline regions, where companies are allowed to have a 100% “reserve.” This is very important for ferroalloy and pipe plants, but does not affect large mining and metallurgical enterprises in other territories that also have this need.
The problem of expensive logistics can only be partially solved, more through improving logistics capabilities than through reducing costs. The state could cover the losses from Ukrzaliznytsia’s passenger transportation in the amount of UAH 20-22 billion per year, but the question remains open as to whether such funds will be found against the backdrop of huge defense expenditures.
At the same time, the Cabinet’s action program does not address the issue of currency restrictions, which falls under the jurisdiction of the National Bank of Ukraine, the timely return of VAT to exporters, or the high cost of electricity.
In general, experts have certain hopes for the new government, but without expecting radical changes in economic policy. In fact, nothing else could be expected, since there was only a formal reboot of the government without the appearance of “new faces” and a fundamental change in approaches to economic management under martial law.
Moreover, the previous composition of the Cabinet of Ministers did not even report to parliament. And it is clear that the previous government was directly involved in the partial failure to implement many of the most important programs in wartime: the timely provision of all necessary supplies to the Armed Forces, mobilization, the construction of fortifications, and the maximum de-shadowing of the economy.
The main point is that the measures outlined in the draft action program of the Cabinet of Ministers are not capable of solving the key current problem—strengthening economic growth.
At the end of the first half of the year, there was a slowdown or decline in key macroeconomic indicators:
Since the beginning of the war, the economy has been managed in a rather haphazard manner, and the scale of support for business remains extremely limited. As long as the war continues, this situation is unlikely to change due to the enormous expenditures on defense and security.
Businesses will already be satisfied if management decisions in Ukraine are made taking into account the consequences for the economy in wartime. These include increases in state monopoly tariffs without considering the negative consequences for Ukrainian businesses and the search for internal reserves to improve performance.
Ukrainian Railways' (UZ) current financial situation is critical: the company has declared a technical default…
Demand for steel in Iceland is met entirely by imports. Not only is there no…
Turkey is an important geopolitical and economic partner for Ukraine: a mediator in negotiations, a…
The trend in steel sales in Denmark shows little correlation with developments in the country’s…
The domestic market is facing an unprecedented test of resilience. The combination of a full-scale…
The Norwegian steel market is resilient to external shocks. Its consumption pattern differs from the…